JCC Nursery School of State College

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
811239262
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
Location
State College, PA, US
Phone
(814) 359-6665
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$85,799
Expenses
$77,987
Assets
$65,046
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Chad Owens (Board President)

People named in this filing

  • Chad Owens (Board President)
  • Lauren Cameron (Board Treasurer)
  • Sarah Zarzycki (Board Registrar)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a play-based, mixed-age preschool education that incorporates Jewish traditions, is welcoming to all backgrounds, and fosters a sense of community through parent involvement.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our school is a part-time nursery school operation, educating children 2 years, 7 months until Kindergarten. In spring 2024, we had 25 children enrolled. For our summer camp program, we enrolled 24 students. We employ 2 teachers during the school year, and 2 teachers during our summer camp program. We rely on a volunteer parent-run board to operate the school. Through our nurturing, play-based program, we equip students with the emotional and academic tools needed to enter Kindergarten and beyond.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 63.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -75% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.