The Jewish-Christian Discovery Center
Legal name: Jewish-Christian Discovery Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825359717
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Johns Creek, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6783662244
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $577,203
- Expenses
- $202,682
- Assets
- $1,041,173
- Liabilities
- $112
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Albert I Slomovitz (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Albert I Slomovitz (President): $25,000 total reported compensation
- Rachel S Slomovitz (Director of Operations): $20,756 total reported compensation
- Michael Tutterow (Director): $2,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dr. Abraham aka Rabbi Albert Slomovitz, Ph.D. created the educational non-profit, ‘The Jewish-Christian Discovery Center’ in 2018. Holding multiple degrees from Columbia University and Loyola University of Chicago, Dr. Slomovitz is an interfaith expert. He draws upon his military and law enforcement chaplaincy when speaking at conferences, schools and Churches. If you are interested in bringing Dr. Slomovitz to your next speaking engagement, please email us [email protected]. What’s our mission? The goal of the JCDC is to respectfully educate Jews and Christians about the countless faith-based connections that they have.** This awareness is accomplished by relating the religious.
What it reported doing in 2025
Project Let There Be Light PLTBL Created nationwide billboards and TV PSAs in 7 several large metropolitan areas, including Atlanta GA, Hartford CT, Little Rock AR, Montgomery AL, Orlando FL, Anchorage AK, and Lincoln NE with messaging linking Hanukkah and Christmas, managed a website, sent out approximately 5,000 menorah ornaments for Christmas trees, produced and aired a PSA about PLTBL, and asked for general donations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 31
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.6%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 58.6%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 64.9%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.14; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 20.6% of revenue deployed · 58.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $119K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $25K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 16 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX AllOtherExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX InformationTechnology column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.