Jesus Loves Bangladesh Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830535123
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Muldrow, OK, USA
Phone
9187746008
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,483
Expenses
$42,880
Assets
$8,430

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Heath Fouts (President, Dir.)

People named in this filing

  • Heath Fouts (President, Dir.)
  • Jents Talukder (Secretary, Dir.)
  • William Pfeiler (Treasurer, Dir.)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to provide shelter and build orphanages for abandoned and neglected children in Bangladesh. This program will also provide for their physical and spiritual needs in a Christian home environment. Jesus Loves Bangladesh (in the US) raises money for childrens homes and mission work in Bangladesh. Jesus Loves Bangladesh Trust (in Bangladesh) does the day-to-day work of taking care of the children, flood relief, and other mission work. Jesus Loves Bangladesh Trust is set up as an NGO in Bangladesh. They are the boots on the ground in Bangladesh. The organizations have similar names because we think of them as basically one organization. There is one person (Jents Talukdar) who is from Bangladesh and is on both boards of directors. The money raised by Jesus Loves Bangladesh goes toward supporting the work done in Bangladesh by Jesus Loves Bangladesh Trust.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our accomplishments for 2025 include: a. Supported the Childrens home in Bangladesh with 12 young boys; b. Distribution of Bibles.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.6%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.