Jersey Lanes Junior Bowling Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223547285
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Linden, NJ, USA
Phone
9084866300
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports Competitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,584
Expenses
$1,250
Assets
$128,711
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN FATIGATI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN FATIGATI (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose for which this corporation is organized is to provide an educational program wth adult leadership and guidance for members; to encourage participation and recognize achievement in the game of tenpins while maintaining the ideals of amateurism in order to preserve the eligibility of members to participate in school athletic and related programs and to help develop in youth the ideals of sportsmanship and good citizenship; and to promote physical fitness, mental alertness, and morally sound patterns of behavior.

What it reported doing in 2024

Approximately 160 children participate in the junior bowling league. They are encouraged to learn sportsmanship, courtesy, and leadership in addition to mastering the sport of tenpin bowling. Scholarships are awarded to exceptional participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 90
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 90.1%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 102.97; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.