Jericho Road Community Health Center

Overview

Mission

We honor the dignity of every person by delivering culturally responsive care and advancing the health of our communities, rooted in the love of Jesus. The Glicks recognized the connection between physical, mental, and spiritual well-being. Providing excellent medical care was not enough, but a medical practice with limited resources could not do any more. So, as an expression of the heart behind the medical services, Jericho Road Ministries (JRM) was born. Founded in 2003, the ministry sought to demonstrate God’s compassion for every person by fighting poverty at its roots, coming alongside JRFP to address the non-medical needs of the community. JRM developed a wide spectrum of programming, from mentoring pregnant refugee mothers to helping clients navigate Social Services to providing interpretation support. 2004 Genesee Street Center Ope.

Operating model

Revenue model

Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.

Distribution model

Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

• Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

• Financial Efficiency: 88
• Transparency & Controls: 69
• Accountability: 90
• Sustainability: 36
• Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Details

• What they do: 2 operating locations identified
• Where the money goes: 89.7% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
• Governance: 14 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
• Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $50.3M in reported program spending
• Leadership: top reported pay $293K · 28 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
• Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
• Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
• Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
• Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
• Contacts: How to reach this organization
• Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
• Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
• People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

• High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
• Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
• Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
• High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
• High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
• Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.
• Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
• High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.