Jeremiahs Place
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463860464
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5057103010
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $455,592
- Expenses
- $350,587
- Assets
- $435,246
- Liabilities
- $8,082
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gilberto U Silva (President)
- Elizabeth Silva (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Elizabeth Silva (Vice President): $44,000 total reported compensation
- James S Silva (Treasurer): $28,200 total reported compensation
- Amber Silva (Secretary): $28,200 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
After graduating high school adults with special needs often dont know what to do next. Our goal is to offer those individuals a place where they can continue to learn grown and live a fulfilling productive life as an adult.
What it reported doing in 2025
Currently have only one program that focuses on the teaching of independence and confidence through life skill classes to the special needs community. Currently average about 49 students per week. Our program incorporates classes in education activities and life skills. The students also enjoy some relaxation and fun through our annual field trips to the Biopark the Natural History Museum and more. Our education includes STEAM reading comprehension and physical education as well as classes in the promotion of healthy eating. The students are stimulated through creative art projects including but not limited to canvas and watercolor painting wood projects and clay sculpting. The students have an opportunity to participate in live performances through our performing arts program. We are now meeting 5 days per week increasing the average weekly students per week. We are actively seeking grants for the next year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 86% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.7%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 64.6%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.6%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 56.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.7% of revenue deployed · 64.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $227K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $44K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 44 of 44 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.