Jeremiah's Inn Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222567080
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Worcester, MA, USA
Phone
5087556403
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospices

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,516,614
Expenses
$2,876,894
Assets
$4,507,908
Liabilities
$762,662

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICIA DAVIDSON ESQ (PRESIDENT)
  • MELANIE AMIR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RICHARD QUINLAN (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • RICHARD QUINLAN (CEO): $106,580 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Jeremiah's inn uses a social model to provide residents with a safe environment in which to begin recovery. We foster a sense of community and mutual aid through partnerships, volunteerism and our nutrition center.

What it reported doing in 2025

Jeremiah's inn residential rehabilitation services - a 29-bed transitional living program offering a structured environment that supports residents' recovery from alcohol and/or other drugs as well as acquisition of skills needed for an independent lifestyle. Utilizing the "social-model" of recovery, this is a program that combines peer-support and experiential learning with holistic and clinically-based treatment. Individualized, goal-oriented rehabilitative services are provided in a group and one-on-one setting in conjunction with ongoing support and assistance in developing and maintaining the interpersonal and life-skills necessary to lead a healthy and productive substance-free lifestyle. We guide residents' toward becoming contributing members of society, while meeting their basic needs for food, shelter and clothing. Residents' participate in clinical groups such as early recovery, relapse prevention, healthy relationships and life skills. They receive information and resources about HIV/AIDS and hepatitis c and learn skills such as resume-writing/job readiness, anger management, conflict resolution, healthy relationships and parenting. Through our wellness program they can participate in yoga, reiki, mindfulness and meditation and outdoor/physical activities such as rowing, hiking, disk golf, and softball.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.3%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $32.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.2%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.57; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.3% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $107K · 11 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $312K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.