Jefferson County Farmers Federation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 630384181
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mccalla, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2054777857
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $394,834
- Expenses
- $292,966
- Assets
- $1,901,268
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVAN H PARSONS (PRESIDENT/PART YEAR)
- JAMES M CARMACK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRAD FULLER (PRESIDENT/PART YEAR)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVAN H PARSONS (PRESIDENT/PART YEAR): $7,750 total reported compensation
- RHONDA R HUGHES (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $1,107 total reported compensation
- ALVIN O ANDERSON (DIRECTOR): $1,100 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promotion of agricultural activities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Farmers, county-wide members, and non-members benefit from promotions targeted toward enhancing the image of farming as a profession.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 53% for direct work, and 47% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.6%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.1%; rating input score 98; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.8%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.49; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.6% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $229K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $8K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.