Jeffco Patriots

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871882364
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Cedar Hill, MO, USA
Phone
3146601242
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Voter Education, Registration

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,935
Expenses
$5,910
Assets
$1,752
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alan Leaderbrand (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jaclyn Riebold (Treasurer)
  • Alan Leaderbrand (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate the community at large on ballot candidates and issues that affect our local county

What it reported doing in 2024

We started this group in August 2021 and set out to get our county to know that they had a new group with a sole purpose of educating the residents of ballot candidates and issues, as well as issues currently within our county government. Our first few months was solely spent on growing our supporters, registering the group with the state MEC, state SOS and IRS as 501c4. By the end of 2023 we had a social media following of approx. 1200 people and successfully completed about 25 outreach tents in the community to educate the community on how elections work, when to be registered on the ballot to run as candidate, when to register to vote by and why this is so important to be involved. We also started our own website

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -103.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.