Jc Positive Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273613811
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Florence, OR, USA
Phone
8054402623
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$6,036
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALVIN CABLE (President)

People named in this filing

  • ALVIN CABLE (President)
  • KAREN BURKE (Secretary)
  • MATTHEW ESCODEDO (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose of this corporation is to provide assistance to recovering persons and their families. The Corporation is founded to provide assistance to persons recovering from major life issues such a alcohol or chemical addictions, loss of loved ones, loss of livelihood, loss of housing due to one of the previously listed and non-listed situations.

What it reported doing in 2022

J.C. Positive, Inc. will provide meeting spaces for 12 step and/or educational programs to benefit the public for parenting and recovery from core issues that could lead to chemical addictions. J.C. Positive will also lease/rent/buy property in founding and managing sober living environment for men and women.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2016 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.