Jbs Transition Experts Dba Vetctap
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364834690
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Vista, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7602126673
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,137
- Expenses
- $85,312
- Assets
- $115,936
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANIS WHITAKER (President)
- MIKE PLUE (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JANIS WHITAKER (President)
- BETSY SHEETS (Director)
- MARY SCHWALEN (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
VetCTAP's mission is to increase the veteran employment rate by helping transitioning veterans and military spouses build personal confidence and enhance their individual economic stability through job search skills training, practical tools, and one-on-one coaching.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the year, the Organization accomplished the following:- Added AI as a tool for the Interview Module. - Gained 2 new volunteer coaches.- Restarted the HME Tour for VetCTAP Grads in 2025 that had occurred in 2023.- Partnered with a financial planner to offer a Financial Planning Workshop (custom to VetCTAP). It will launch in January 2026.- Attended the ViaSat Military event in 2025, which brought in new participants (active-duty and spouses).- Continued to partner with IVMF-O2O presenting 3 times Discovering Your Career Path, which generated participants (active-duty, veterans within one-year of transition, and spouses).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.9%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 63.4%; rating input score 63
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.6%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.9% of revenue deployed · 63.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.