Jazz Education Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262880358
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
3127816299
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Music

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$772,491
Expenses
$601,698
Assets
$495,935
Liabilities
$67,066

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSE DIAZ (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID KAUFFMAN (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • ASHLEY SHABANKAREH (DIRECTOR)
  • JOSE DIAZ (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID KAUFFMAN (PRESIDENT EL)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The jazz education network is dedicated to building the jazz arts community by advancing education, promoting performance, and developing new audiences.

What it reported doing in 2023

Founded in 2008, the jazz education network (jen) is a preeminent jazz arts service organization that supports music educators, students, professional musicians, researchers, music industry professionals, and jazz enthusiasts. Jen is guided by its mission of serving as a global organization dedicated to building the jazz arts community by advancing education, promoting performance, and developing audiences. Jen is committed to representing and cultivating diversity, equity, and inclusion in all areas of its operation including staff, board members, volunteers, presenters, clinicians, performers and audiences. This commitment is present in all programs and decision making. We work to support the jazz community through programs that advance each aspect of our mission: community sessions and workshops: during the covid-19 pandemic, jen pivoted its organizational focus on providing year-round opportunities for the jen community to connect and learn. The organization hosts webinars, including workshops, panel discussions, and community forums, for the jen community and community-at- large to learn about new teaching strategies, practice techniques, and more. Over 57,000 individuals have been reached through this program. Scholarships: jen's scholarship program has been in existence since the organization's founding and remains an important benefit to the students we serve. Each year, we recognize talented, hardworking students with a passion for jazz. Jen has given over 100,000 in scholarships. Jazz2u: with support from the herb alpert foundation, jazz2u was formed to help bring clinicians and performers to schools and community centers across the country. The program has given more than 200,000 to support bringing artists directly to schools and community centers, with 35,000 individuals served per year. Sisters in jazz collegiate combo: in an effort to support jen's commitment to represent and cultivate diversity, equity, and inclusion in jazz, the sisters in jazz collegiate combo competition brings together women and non-binary jazz artists between 18-29. The program celebrates the talent and influence of women and non-binary jazz artists, and is led by a noteworthy woman in jazz. Past directors have included ingrid jensen, tia fuller, and claire daly. The combo rehearses and performs at the annual jen conference. Young composers showcase: the young composer showcase spotlights young jazz composers. Each year, 6 young composers are selected to premier their work at the annual jen conference. Their compositions are performed by notable performing artists at the annual jen conference. In addition to the premier of their pieces, all selected composers also participate in mentoring sessions with jazz composers. Over 70 young composers have participated in this program since its inception in 2012. Commissioned charts program: in 2016, jen began to commission charts to support the jen community. Each year, jen's membership receives 6 free charts per year, including vocal jazz and big band arrangements. In 2021, jen commissioned charts from ayn inserto, kate skinner, john clayton, kris berg, john stafford ii, and miguel zenon jenerations jazz festival: the jenerations jazz festival is mounted in conjunction with our annual conference each year and is open to any primary school, secondary school, collegiate, or community ensemble . Jenerations jazz festival participants play a 30-minute set before an audience and then work for 30-minutes in a clinic session with professional musicians who have observed the performance. These clinicians discuss the performance and support the individuals performers in ways they can elevate their art. Students who take part in the jenerations jazz festival then join us for our annual conference, continuing their learning experience from jazz professionals and industry experts. Annual conference: the culmination of jen's activities is at its annual conference, held in a different region of the united state

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 76%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.1%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 76% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $457K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.