Jaxs Transitional Homes Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820806034
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6023016461
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Shelters

Reported finances

Revenue
$200,406
Expenses
$186,903
Assets
$17,496
Liabilities
$31,054

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jacquelyn Valrie (President)
  • Marcello Byrd (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jacquelyn Valrie (President): $43,031 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Jax's Transitional Homes Inc focusing on providing housing for individuals free from alcohol or drug addiction and helping them reintegrate into the workforce through opportunities at sports arenas and concert venues. This type of program addresses both the housing and employment needs of individuals seeking to rebuild their lives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Men from all ages, backgrounds, and ethnicities can see their lives or the lives of their loved ones harmed by substance abuse. Jax's Transitional Homes Inc. provides treatment programs to help overcome addiction. By establishing partnerships with local addiction treatment centers, social services, and organizations that can provide support services for residents. Collaborate with local businesses, sports arenas, and concert venues to create employment opportunities for the residents. Offer counseling, rehabilitation, and support services to address the underlying issues related to addiction and homelessness. We provide life skills training, financial literacy programs, and educational opportunities to enhance residents' overall well-being. We have established clear metrics and indicators to measure the success of our program, both in terms of housing stability and employment outcomes. Regularly evaluate and adjust our programs based on feedback and outcomes. Our goal is for every client to experience a profound change through cutting edge, evidence-based practices provided by an experienced, compassionate team, in a safe environment. We know that true change is possible and sustainable. This is the organization main source of income to provide for the men and women who are in need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 37
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.8%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 59.9%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.7%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.77; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.8% of revenue deployed · 59.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $112K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $43K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.