Jas Non-profit Housing Corporation Vi
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383487987
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Southfield, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2489674240
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,041,864
- Expenses
- $5,518,491
- Assets
- $12,161,710
- Liabilities
- $9,862,748
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JASON FISHER (PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN RAZNICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ALAN STERNFELD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SCOTT MARCUS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CAROLYN COHEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NANCY S HEINRICH (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- NANCY S HEINRICH (CEO): $339,233 total reported compensation
- KARA POWERS (CFO - PART YEAR): $202,358 total reported compensation
- DIANNE AZZOPARDI (HR DIRECTOR): $150,746 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Resident services coordinator - service coordinators are an integral part of residential communities that house families, elders and persons with disabilities. They link residents with supportive services allowing them to maintain self sufficiency in their homes. Some of the typical services arranged on behalf of the residents include: meals, transportation, health care, and homemaking as well as other health and supportive services. Service coordinators also provide group supportive interventions, ongoing grief counseling and crisis intervention for residents, families and the greater community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.3%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.2% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 26 of 27 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $339K · 35 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.