Jars of Glory Company
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882774991
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- West Melbourne, FL, USA
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $47,572
- Expenses
- $30,963
- Assets
- $33,154
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- David Ogba (Founder)
- Alice Ogba (Treasurer)
- Richard Murphy (Board of Director - Chair)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See Schedule O
What it reported doing in 2025
In June and July Jars of Glory hosted a four-week financial literacy program for teens at the Neighbor Up Brevard DOCK summer camp with about 20 students participating each week. Through interactive simulations discussions and decision-making challenges the sessions covered budgeting spending earning saving and planning for the future. This hands-on series equipped teens with practical tools to make wise financial choices fostering confidence and leadership skills that will benefit them throughout their lives. Bridge - Think Better: A Teens Critical Thinking Toolkit - In September Jars of Glory delivered a four-week creativity and judgment program for teens meeting on four consecutive Thursdays. Through quick-fire games real-life decision-making challenges and a themed reward store that encouraged active participation students learned to generate ideas evaluate options and present persuasive solutions. The program strengthened critical-thinking and communication skill
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.5%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 73%; rating input score 73
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.9%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 47.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.5% of revenue deployed · 73% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 9 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.