Japanese Coordinating Council of San Diego
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237392777
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6192657371
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $250
- Expenses
- $1,634
- Assets
- $16,681
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MASANOBU KINJO (President)
- YOSHIKO MONJI (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- MASANOBU KINJO (President)
- YOSHIKO MONJI (Vice President)
- KOSHI MATSUSHITA (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
(a) The specific and primary purposes are to encourage, promote, and carry on charitable activities through a coordinating council of Japanese organizations, individuals, and other interested organizations in San Diego county.(b) In general, to encourage, promote and carry on charitable activities for the general welfare of the people of San Diego County.(c) Provided, however, that this corporation is not empowered to engage in any activity which is not in furtherance of its purposes as set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) above.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided activities and training for sailors on visiting Japanese JMSDF(Japan Self Defense Force) ships.Provided meals and activities for elderly Japanese community members (Senior Appreciation Day).Japanese American Community Memorial Service activities on Memorial DayArranged fund raising activities to provide donations to support local Japanese Churches, Buddist Temple, and Balboa Park Japanese Friendship Garden.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -553.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.21; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.