Jane's House
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201431159
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Tracyton, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3608718471
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $198,451
- Expenses
- $181,225
- Assets
- $44,080
- Liabilities
- $23,197
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN RODRIGUEZ (PRESIDENT)
- RODERICK LENDERS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN RODRIGUEZ (PRESIDENT)
- ERIC REIDT (TREASURER)
- JANE RODRIGUEZ (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Jane's house exists to proclaim the gospel message to all, train third world pastors, plant churches in communities where no church exits, and provide long term care for orphans and widows.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided school supplies, clothing medical supplies, sewing machines and rent on home for orphans in india and building fund.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 18
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.1%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 19
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.1% of revenue deployed · 18.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.