James Sandoval Preparatory High School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861018312
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Glendale, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6238450781
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $887,581
- Expenses
- $341,292
- Assets
- $3,910,568
- Liabilities
- $75,113
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVEN DURAND (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVEN DURAND (PRESIDENT &): $96,975 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOL MOSLEY (DIRECTOR): $17,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
James sandoval preparatory high school will provide an educational environment where students can learn and thrive in a challenging, innovative, and invitational atmosphere. The school strives to develop the unique qualities and talents of each student through relevant and inspiring instruction supported by respect and understanding. The school will serve all students who may benefit from our programs regardless of race, nationality or creed.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide additional academic choices for parents and students and to improve pupil achievement. The organization provided educational services to approximately 55 students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.9%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.46; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.9% of revenue deployed · 70.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $240K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.