The Barry Robinson Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541038721
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Norfolk, VA, USA
Phone
1-800-221-1995
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,354,413
Expenses
$30,528,651
Assets
$61,664,984
Liabilities
$30,588,187

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Charles V Mcphillips (President)
  • Donald F Price (Vice President)
  • Robert McCartney (Chief Executive Officer)

Highest reported compensation

  • Abdul Mateen (Medical Director): $427,402 total reported compensation
  • Robert McCartney (Chief Executive Officer): $390,775 total reported compensation
  • W Lawrence Daniels (Pediatric Nurse Practitioner): $282,596 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Barry Robinson Center provides a holistic environment that sets youth and their families on the path to healing.

What it reported doing in 2024

At The Barry Robinson Center, JBRI provides hope and healing to military-connected families through exceptional behavioral health residential treatment. Located on an inviting 18-acre campus in Norfolk, Virginia, the Center is the nation's first, and remains the only, residential treatment facility exclusively committed to serving military-connected youth. With a strong reputation for effectively managing complex cases, even across geographic distances, the Center has welcomed admissions from nearly every U.S. state and several countries.BRC's staff, many of whom are military-connected themselves understand the unique challenges military families face. Multiple moves, changing schools, and being separated from parents during training or deployments are all issues that can follow families even after service has ended. Residents and families will find an understanding community that shares their experiences, and a strong support network for their treatment journey. Our mission-driven staff of compassionate professionals provide individualized, holistic treatment for every individual in our care. Our program includes staff psychiatrists, nurses, master's prepared therapists, other mental health professionals, a licensed and accredited school, and therapeutic recreational activities. BRC's collaborative treatment approach includes structured family therapy designed to help youth reintegrate back into their communities upon discharge. Every interaction during a resident's time at BRC has a therapeutic component, from visiting with the facility dog, to equine assisted learning, scout program, music program, voluntary spiritual life program, and much more. Our treatment outcomes demonstrate the success of our approach, and we're always evaluating and looking for ways to enhance our service to military-connected youth and their families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.6%; rating input score 98; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $25.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $427K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.5M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.