Jain Society of Central Virginia
Legal name: Jain Society of Virginia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264546863
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Glen Allen, VA, United States
- Phone
- +1 (804) 415-8020
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hinduism
- Affiliation
- Jainism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,996
- Expenses
- $1,205
- Assets
- $180,923
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Navin Sheth (Director)
- Sanjay Gandhi (Director)
- Bipan Jain (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Jain Society of Central Virginia provides a forum for Jains to observe and perform activities related to Jainism, preserve Jain culture for future generations, and promote fellowship among all Jains. Support Jain Society of Central Virginia. When you shop at **smile.amazon.com,** Amazon donates. Copyright © 2026 Jain Society of Central Virginia | Credits Powered by Jain Society of Central Virginia. Founded in 2016, Jain Society of Central Virginia (JSCVA) is a non-profit charitable organization based on the principles of Jainism. The primary principle of the Jain religion is Nonviolence. This organization provides a forum for Jains to observe and perform various activities related to Jainism, to preserve the Jain culture for future generations and to promote fellowship among all Jains. Starting with 50 families in 2016, the total membership at present has reached to 70 families. JaI...
What it reported doing in 2024
Paryushan for 8 days and Mahavir Jayanti and Anniversary Dhwja
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 150.14; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.