Jacksonville Seminole Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592053762
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Phone
8506446000
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alumni Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,696
Expenses
$4,376
Assets
$5,322
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRYSON CLIFTON (PRESIDENT)
  • RODERICK MOORE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRYSON CLIFTON (PRESIDENT)
  • RODERICK MOORE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RYAN SIMPSON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The jacksonville seminoleboosters is organized to promote the welfare, development andadvancement of Florida state university at its educational, scientificand programmatic purposes. Seminole clubs are organized groups ofpeople who support and are dedicated to the Florida state universityathletic and academic missions. Seminole clubs are responsible forproviding a connection with the university to their members throughhosting strategic programming throughout the year such as communityservice, continuing education, networking and social events.

What it reported doing in 2024

Providing strategic programming for fsu alumni; communityservice, continuing education, networking, and socialevents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -62.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -32.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.