Jacksons Brush Puppy Rescue
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933882767
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Pearsall, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8474093713
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,197
- Expenses
- $8,627
- Assets
- $5,216
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Katherine Dyck (President, Director)
- Kristina Contreras (Vice President, Director)
People named in this filing
- Katherine Dyck (President, Director)
- Kristina Contreras (Vice President, Director)
- Isabella Hunter (Treasurer, Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are providing a safe haven for pups in need. Our mission is to rescue, rehabilitate, and partner with national rescues to transport our pups out of Texas for dogs of all shapes and sizes. We work with local animal control officers to prevent euthanasia when their space is full as well as helping community members that find injured or stray dogs and accidental litters (with the exception they spay/neuter the parents of the litter).
What it reported doing in 2024
Our mission is to rescue, rehabilitate, and partner with national rescues to transport our pups out of Texas for dogs of all shapes and sizes. We work with local animal control officers to prevent euthanasia when their space is full as well as helping community members that find injured or stray dogs and accidental litters (with the exception they spay/neuter the parents of the litter). We have two programs at present; rescue and rehabilitation, followed by transporting dogs outside of Texas. We are a foster based rescue, which means when we have a foster that has the space, we are able to take dogs in to our rescue. We get the veterinary care to get them healthy, including testing, treatments, and preventatives. When we have near expiring preventatives and vaccinations that we do not have dogs in our rescue that need them, we give them to dogs still in animal control's care to help improve their health and quality of life. We feed and provide shelter, safety, and comfort for dogs that we save until we can organize a transportation to a partner rescue out of state. Expenses shown include the supplies we use for everyday necessities including food, cleaning products, pee pads, dog cots, bowls, dog diapers, treats, and toys.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -292.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.