Jackson Health Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
650077727
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
3055854483
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,993,809
Expenses
$4,082,723
Assets
$44,670,494
Liabilities
$637,544

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FLAVIA LLIZO (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • BEATRIZ G GALAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT)
  • ALEXANDRA SALCEDO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF ADVANCEMENT SERVICES)

Highest reported compensation

  • FLAVIA LLIZO (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $428,449 total reported compensation
  • BEATRIZ G GALAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $186,323 total reported compensation
  • ALEXANDRA SALCEDO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF ADVANCEMENT SERVICES): $172,072 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Jackson health foundation operates exclusively to support jackson health system a code sec 170(b)(1)(a)(iii) organization and the onlypublic hospital in miamidade county, Florida. Its mission is to raise funds to support jackson health system's mission of providing a singlehigh standard of quality care for all residents of miamidade county, while also delivering worldclass specialty care for patients across thecountry and around the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

International kids fund (ikf) is a philanthropic program that helps critically ill children primarily from latin america and the caribbean gain immediate access to essential medical treatments that are unavailable in their respective countries. Ikf successfully raises funds and administers proactive assistance for foreign children with urgent health care needs to receive expert attention at the holtz children's hospital in the jackson health system.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 29
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10%; rating input score 10
  • Program expense ratio: 52.5%; rating input score 52
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 82.2%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.94; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10% of revenue deployed · 52.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $428K · 29 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.