Jack Mental Health Advocacy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863051195
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, USA
Phone
9042336515
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$89,563
Expenses
$81,787
Assets
$213,608
Liabilities
$422

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARILYN SPILLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KIM VINCENTY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MALLORY HEPP (BOARD MEMBER)
  • PATTI HUGHES (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MICHAEL KRESS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable purposes, including the support of those individuals who struggle with ocd, related anxiety disorders, and depression; mental health practitioners by providing funds for their training and workshops; scholarships for sufferers with ocd to attend related national conferences; and programming activities for sufferers with ocd.

What it reported doing in 2025

Jack mental health advocacy will support mental health initiatives in the areas of education and programming to support those that struggle with ocd, related anxiety disorders, and depression. We will support mental health practitioners by providing funds to attend training workshops. Having well-trained technicians to treat ocd and related disorders is key to positive outcomes for sufferers. We also hope to offer scholarships for sufferers to attend national conferences. This will provide them with the education and access to resources that will aid in recovery. We will seek to partner with other nonprofits serving in our area of interest to bring programming activities for sufferers in many different areas of the united states and puerto rico. We will actively be fostering relationships and giving resources to community foundations and nonprofits seeking to enhance programming in the area of mental health. We will take a strong interest in stigma prevention, underserved youth, and those with co-occuring substance use disorders. We will offer program content in the areas of film, art therapy, performance therapy, and video as a way to appeal to a progressive and media-focused audience. Serving families that want to launch mental health initiatives in their communities and schools will be another outreach project we will persue. Helping families with limited resourches for treatment is a goal we hope to achieve.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.61; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $82K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.