J Curtis Sanford Parade Committee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
030600035
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
9723835700
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Commemorative Events

Reported finances

Expenses
$24,501
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM R PALEN (CHAIRMAN)
  • MICHAEL A DEAHL (VICE CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY)
  • ANDY BAKER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Raise college scholarship funds for high school athletes by sponsoring in downtown dallas, or other local area location, a traditional, family-friendly new year's eve day parade, or a parade near the time of the annual college football game presented by the cotton bowl athletic association. The parade will allow high school bands and dance/cheer teams from Texas and other states the opportunity to march in the parade as part of the cotton bowl music festival.

What it reported doing in 2015

Prior years' primary exempt purpose achievements included new years eve day parades in dallas, tx with many attending the parades while thousands watched on television and by live internet streaming. More than 1,500 students from high schools across the united states participated in the parades. Due to the change in venue for the annual cotton bowl college football game, the annual parade was temporarily suspended the last four years. A final grant was given to the cotton bowl foundaiton this year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -43.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.