J Craig Venter Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521842938
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
La Jolla, CA, USA
Phone
8582001800
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Biological & Life Sciences

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,407,483
Expenses
$19,604,869
Assets
$39,462,295
Liabilities
$8,297,989

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VENTER JOHN CRAIG (CHAIRMAN & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • VENTER JOHN CRAIG (CHAIRMAN & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $1,213,531 total reported compensation
  • KOWALSKI HEATHER (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $382,268 total reported compensation
  • MULLEN JILL (SR. VP OF PHILANTHROPY): $318,561 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

J. Craig venter institute (jcvi) is an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization advancing the science of genomics committed to accelerating foundational scientific research to drive advances in human health and environmental sustainability. This past year jcvi committed research efforts in human health, environmental sustainability, synthetic biology, and software tools and technology.

What it reported doing in 2024

National science foundation continues to fund the j. Craig venter institute (jcvi) in the areas of synthetic biology, integrative organismal systems core programs. Funded by the office of international science and engineering, dr. Tae seok moon, jcvi professor leads an international consortium through a global center to address the challenges of recalcitrant waste streams by developing integrated, novel, and scalable processes for their valorization, integrating researchers all over the world and from academia and industry, and providing global education, outreach activities, and workforce. Global centers: circle: center for innovative recycling and circular economy is suported by research teams in the united states, canada, united kingdom, korea, japan, singapore & australia. This center will develop three core technologies, including (1) multi-omics-based bioprospecting to discover new enzymes, gene regulators, and organisms for waste valorization, (2) predictive computational approaches to enable forward engineering of proteins and strains for biomanufacturing, and (3) tea, lca, and risk assessment to develop commercially viable bioprocesses for waste valorization. To demonstrate the utility and generalizability of the developed core technologies, we will develop commercially viable valorization processes for three waste streams, including mixed plastics, c1 gases, and biogenic wastes (e.g., food, agricultural, and paper/cardboard wastes). If successful, these high-risk, high-return center projects will provide novel waste conversion processes that can be considered for commercial-scale, sustainable bioproduction. This is multi-year international study. The us consortium has been funded upto $4.9m. Non-us collaborators have been funded through research agencies within their own countries. Under the division of molecular and cellular bioscience and in collaboration with the university of Illinois minimal bacterial cell computational modeleing team led by zaida luthey-schulten, jcvi researchers led by dr. John glass, are carrying out transcriptome and metablomic analyses, biochemical and genetic experiements to discover unknown gene functions, optimization of a minimal cell defined growth medium, and constrcution of minimal cell mutatns to facilitate the work of jcvi and other group[s investigating minimal cell biology. This is a multi-year study with collaborative funding of $2.0m (~$0.7m jcvi).led by dr. John glass, the jcvi is investigating the mechanism of genome transplantation, develop genome transplantation for at least two species of non-mycoplasma bacteria, and use microfluidics technology to automate and improve the efficiency of genome transplantation. Genome transplantation, the insertion of a complete bacterial genome into a suitable recipient cell so that the donated genome commandeers the recipient cell to produce a new cell with the genotype and phenotype of the donated genome, was the fundamental technical development that enabled the construction of the first bacterium with a synthetic genome. At the announcement of the creation of the world's first synthetic cell, jcvi-syn1.0, the work was heralded as a major accomplishment for humankind. To date, genome transplantation has only been achieved using a small subset if the atypical bacteria called mycoplasmas. This is a multi-year study with collaborative funding of $1.0m.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 79% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 45.5%; rating input score 45
  • Fundraising efficiency: $29.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -36.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.01; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 45.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 16 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $154K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.