Iwikua

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475593452
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Waimea, HI, USA
Phone
8086522127
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$567,417
Expenses
$642,807
Assets
$504,113
Liabilities
$2,994

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSHUA MORI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • FRED FLORES JR (PRESIDENT)
  • JULIA MATSESHE (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSHUA MORI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $104,180 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Iwikua serves as an educational and cultural resource for sustainable food production, wellness, and community enhancement to benefit west kauai and help raise future generations to be culturally-centered life-long learners who fulfill active roles in the community such as farmers, educators, and leaders.

What it reported doing in 2024

Na mahi ho'oko a'e is the educational farm program of iwikua that focuses on sustainable food production, integrating traditional hawaiian gardening techniques with modern technology through the operation of our large-scale aquaponics system and in-ground crops. We provided a variety of fruits and vegetables to our west kauai community members at large through our mini grocery store, as well as thirteen restaurants and businesses and the local hospital. Over the year we worked with high school and college students during school breaks to do intensive internships where they were immersed in the entirety of the farm operation, from seed to sale, helping with planting, harvesting, packaging, marketing, and distribution, as well as learning construction skills throughout the expansion of our farm system. We also had over 75 volunteers throughout the year from high school and college classes that integrated their curriculum into a hands-on application on the farm. These efforts helped produce over 16,000 pounds of produce (including over 14,000 pounds of lettuce) which went directly into feeding the community while providing a unique agricultural and entrepreneurial experience for our local youth.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 45.1%; rating input score 45
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.2%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 32.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 41.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed · 45.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $290K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.