Itnmetrodetroit
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453051404
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Southfield, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2482627269
- Rating
- 34
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,421
- Expenses
- $132,761
- Assets
- $37,994
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Itnmetrodetroit provides dignified transportation for seniors and the visually impaired in the detroit, Michigan area. They help adult children minimize absenteeism from work and seniors begin a new chapter in their lives that replaces dependence and isolation with independence and mobility. It is a membership based organization with an annual membership fee of 50 for individuals and 75 for family membership service characteristics available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week available for any type of ride within the service area, with no limitations on ride purpose rides are provided in private automobiles by trained drivers people 60 years and older and adults with visual impairments are eligible to join rides may be booked at any time; discounts are applied for shared rides and advance notice share a ride and receive a 20% discount some facts about the service there's a pickup charge and a mileage charge the average charge is approximately 11 no tips allowed an annual membership fee of 5
What it reported doing in 2012
Administration of exempt purpose to offer rides to qualifying people
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.3%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.3% of revenue deployed · 1.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.