Istituto Damaso Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 981576363
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Memphis, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9012198329
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $19,852
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $19,852
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW BOWIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- COLIN HOWELL (SECRETARY): $18,000 total reported compensation
- ANDREW BOWIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $10,417 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation's mission is to support and promote scholarship and conversation related to virtuous, effective ecclesiastical administration, in fidelity to and in the service of the roman catholic church. The corporation's activities could include, but will not be limited to, organizing academic conferences and sponsoring historical, philosophical, and theological scholarship on the topic of ecclesiastical administration in the roman catholic tradition.
What it reported doing in 2020
To support and promote scholarship and conversation related to virtuous, effective ecclesiastical administration, in fidelity to and in the service of the roman catholic church.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 53
- Sustainability: 1
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $18K · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.