Issaquah High Ptsa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911268016
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Tacoma, WA, USA
Phone
2064342979
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,645
Expenses
$90,878
Assets
$58,224
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nicola Doyle (Co-President)
  • Tanya Russell (Co-President)

People named in this filing

  • Nicola Doyle (Co-President)
  • Tanya Russell (Co-President)
  • Meghan Landon (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support and enrich the educational experience of over 2,500 IHS students. Basic student support, college test prep, senior events, reflections art program, student scholarships, recognition for community service, teacher appreciation and partnership with the school district.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide support and enrichment for over 2,500 students. Basic student support, college test prep, senior events, reflections art program, student scholarships, recognition for community service, family and community engagement, involvement and recognition of over 180 staff members, informational materials and assemblies, new family connections program, leadership education, and legislative activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 68.6%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 68.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.