Israeli Civilian Training Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392380468
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
West Palm Beach, FL, USA
Phone
9183921956
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Safety, Disaster Preparedness & Relief N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$136,976
Expenses
$33,234
Assets
$121,337
Liabilities
$17,595

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIMOTHY MILLER (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID ADLER (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • TIMOTHY MILLER (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID SISK (TREASURER, DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID ADLER (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the safety, security and general welfare of israeli civilians by raising funds to establish and support civilian training programs and specialized training centers throughout israel (including samaria) and provide educational instruction and practical training in emergency medical response, personal defense, and emergency preparedness, all of which shall be delivered to israeli civilians by certified israeli instructors.

What it reported doing in 2025

Partnership project with one israel fund to better train the civilian first response teams in judea and samaria

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 75.7%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.65; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.