Israel Heart2heart Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 872051130
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3475533884
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,673,220
- Expenses
- $994,815
- Assets
- $1,917,877
- Liabilities
- $3,506
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAIM SLAVATICKI (CEO AND FOUNDER)
People named in this filing
- CHAIM SLAVATICKI (CEO AND FOUNDER)
- ELROEE BOCHNIK (CO-FOUNDER)
- CHAYA SHANOWITZ (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Israel nbsp; heart2heart nbsp; provides nbsp; critical nbsp; emotional nbsp; psychological nbsp; and nbsp; communal nbsp; support nbsp; to nbsp; israeli nbsp; combat nbsp; veterans nbsp; suffering nbsp; from nbsp; trauma nbsp; and nbsp; ptsd nbsp; the nbsp; organization nbsp; offers nbsp; direct nbsp; trauma nbsp; therapy nbsp; trauma nbsp; yoga nbsp; peer nbsp; mentorship nbsp; healing nbsp; retreats nbsp; and nbsp; holistic nbsp; care nbsp; for nbsp; veterans nbsp; and nbsp; their nbsp; families nbsp; through nbsp; its nbsp; programs nbsp; in nbsp; both nbsp; israel nbsp; and nbsp; the nbsp; united nbsp; statesincluding nbsp; awareness nbsp; initiatives nbsp; community nbsp; events nbsp; and nbsp; mentorship nbsp; trainingisrael nbsp; heart2heart nbsp; builds nbsp; lasting nbsp; connections nbsp; raises nbsp; awareness nbsp; about nbsp; combat nbsp; trauma nbsp; and nbsp; fosters nbsp; healing nbsp; across nbsp; borders
What it reported doing in 2024
Community trauma healing events israel heart2heart hosts ongoing trauma healing events throughout the year in both israel and the united states. These events include trauma yoga sessions inspirational guest speakers music and communal gatherings. Each event is designed to help veterans and their families find emotional release peer connection and therapeutic relief in a supportive healing environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.1%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $52.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 50%; rating input score 50; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 62.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.93; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 60.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 93.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 145.8% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.1% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $800K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.