Isnhs Class'71 Int'l Alumni Assoc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813306873
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
Corona Hills, CA, USA
Phone
9513172978
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,030
Expenses
$4,930
Assets
$2,912
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LAURA U BALANGUE (VICE-PRESIDE)
  • MARIO AQUINO (VICE-PRESIDE)
  • OFELIA C POYRAZOGLU (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Isnhs class '71 international alumni association is a non-profit corporation and shall be operated exclusively for educational and charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501 (c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code. Thus, the purposes for which such association are: 1.to promote, encourage and foster brotherhood, sisterhood, mutual help and support among the members, 2.to promote camaraderie and academic well-being of the ilocos sur national high school graduates and students, 3.to undertake academic and financial assistance and grant scholars especially the indigent but deserving students of isnhs, 4.to support the isnhs global, local, grand and mini reunions, the isnhs programs and projects and activities to develop the academic excellence and leadership and well-being of isnhs students, graduates and faculty members, 5.to support or give financial assistance to needy and other charitable institutions, 6.to pe

What it reported doing in 2021

Scholarship cash award & misc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 30
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 56.3%; rating input score 56
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 42.1%; rating input score 42; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46% of revenue deployed · 56.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 19 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 42/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.