Island Boy Camp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831791886
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Salem, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5626767375
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,128
- Expenses
- $4,782
- Assets
- $295
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Alexander Fuimaono (President)
- Funaki Letisi (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Alexander Fuimaono (President)
- Funaki Letisi (Vice President)
- Sara Futi (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission and purpose is to empower our players to be successful tomorrow. Our goal is to teach young athletes fundamental football skills while building character, confidence, integrity, sportsmanship, and work ethic.
What it reported doing in 2025
We have worked with over 1000 youth from around the state providing mentorship and coaching. We provided a highly competitive platform for youth to showcase their talents to top notch college coaches. We traveled with over 200 kids to Washington, Nevada, and multiple cities in Oregon in an effort to gain them exposure as they continue to work on their craft and be introduced to top notch talent from across the nation. We have helped kids pursue their dream of playing football at the next level at Junior college and Universities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -52.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -22.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.