Isabella Home
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131656656
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7184917208
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $46,909
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- ANN WYATT (CHAIR)
- JAY TALBOT (TREASURER)
- ALEXANDER BALKO (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The not-for-profit organization was established in 1875 for the purpose of providing long-term care for the elderly and adults with chronic disabilities. The role of isabella home has evolved to providing funds, through its investment portfolio, to support its subsidiaries in meeting their not-for-profit missions of providing quality resident-centered care for the elderly and disabled in our community.
What it reported doing in 2025
The not-for-profit organization was established in 1875 for the purpose of providing long-term care for the elderly and adults with chronic disabilities. The role of isabella home has evolved to providing funds, through its investment portfolio, to support its subsidiaries in meeting their not-for-profit missions of providing quality resident-centered care for the elderly and disabled in our community. Effective december 31, 2025, the organization ceased its program operations and is in the process of winding down its remaining affairs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.