Isaac TV INC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833747846
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Canfield, OH, USA
Phone
7192394154
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religious Television
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,151
Expenses
$146,452
Assets
$54,328

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVE ZIMEL (Vice President)
  • Anwar Masih (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTOPHER HICKS (Secretary)
  • DAVE ZIMEL (Vice President)
  • Anwar Masih (President & CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

INTERNATIONAL SATELLITE CHRISTIAN TELEVISION STATION AND PRAYER MEETING EVENT COORDINATION.ISAAC TV in Pakistan and well known outside the country not only has huge viewership but is working to fulfill spiritual & physical needs of Christian community in Pakistan. The community looks up andexpecting support from ISAAC TV.

What it reported doing in 2020

Travel costs for businss meetings and, contacts and content

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.9%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 32.7%; rating input score 33

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -58.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -28.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -69.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -66.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.9% of revenue deployed · 32.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.