Irving Family Advocacy Cntr Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
751737598
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Irving, TX, USA
Phone
9727216521
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,177
Expenses
$120,784
Assets
$243,917
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL GONZALES (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL GONZALES (PRESIDENT)
  • LISA LAKE (MEMBER)
  • DERICK MILLER (MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing the supportive tools to provide effective therapeutic services to individuals, couples and families impacted by trauma, stress, depression, anxiety, and other mental health concerns as well as providing preventive methods and interventions to reduce violence in our community.

What it reported doing in 2024

The counseling department processed approximately 650 applications for services and screened 521 new families for services. We conducted 9,364 sessions for 856 clients. Staff provided crisis counseling 2,350 times and assisted individuals in the development of 2,080 safety plans. In addition, staff provided advocacy services 2,931 times and information and referral services 7,133 times. Hosted illuminate irving in october 2024 to bring awareness about domestic violence to the community. This free community event was held at a local park and individuals were able to hear from an individual whose family member was impacted by domestic violence. Attendees were able to learn about the community resources and warning signs of domestic violence. At the conclusion of the ceremony, individuals were able to release a floating lantern onto the water in honor of those who have suffered from domestic violence. In addition, we hosted kids rock the block, a community event for child abuse prevention month. This event provided a petting zoo, bounce houses, face painting and more for the community and also provided information on free and low cost summer programming for irving children. Staff presented at various community events, city of irving events, various irving isd and other corporate events about the services and resources available at the irving family advocacy center

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.1%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 72.6%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.02; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.1% of revenue deployed · 72.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $88K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.