Irvine Youth Water Polo Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205539614
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Laguna Niguel, CA, USA
Phone
9496890500
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,996,236
Expenses
$1,977,721
Assets
$59,564
Liabilities
$121,139

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nicholas J Baba (President & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Nicholas J Baba (President & CEO): $87,336 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose of this corporation is for water polo instruction, practices, and tournament competition for youths between the ages of six and eighteen.

What it reported doing in 2025

Water polo tournament competitions for youth ages 8 to 18. We organize, orchestrate, and operate the highest level of youth water polo competition events. These competitions provide a necessary experience over and above training and instruction, for our own members as well as other local, regional, and national youth athletes. We have consistently run these events year after year. In addition to our own long running legacy events, we also host major competitions for USA Water Polo, the national governing body for the sport, as well as offering event support to other groups to elevate the level of their events. Needless to say, the Covid pandemic has hit us hard, as one can see from the negative return for 2020, and if not for Federal and local grants, and Federal EIDL loan we would have needed to shut our doors. In 2021 we were able to begin hosting events in July in order to resume this aspect of our Mission and Program Service Accomplishments. In 2022 we were back to pre-Covid levels but with increased costs of operations forcing increased entry fees increasing our gross as well as expenses. In 2023 we continued to experience increasing costs for operation of events but without increasing entry fees. In 2024 it became necessary to increase entry fees to accommodate the increased facility and staffing costs. For 2025, USAWP has changed the proforma for NJO's, so we do not have a separate NJO income and expense section. All tournament involved aspects for this portion of our mission statement is included in this section. We have developed a new events system to handle any event, soup to nuts, with entries, scheduling, publishing of results in multiple formats, and the ability to handle more efficiently new Safe Sport protocols for these vents. (See Kahunaevents.com)

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.1%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.03; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.