Iron Athletics
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813772200
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Brush Prairie, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3606078709
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Basketball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $31,124
- Expenses
- $32,714
- Assets
- $10,357
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN BORK (PRESIDENT)
- JEREMY ECKLUND (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN BORK (PRESIDENT)
- JEREMY ECKLUND (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SCOTT WEAVER (BOARD OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Purpose is designed to develop young athletes through youth basketball teams to build their skills and talents for basketball, leadership and team play at a national level with a reduced cost. We developed 6 teams, 3 for girls an 3 for boys, to compete in youth basketball. The teams were for 6th grade through 11th grade. We served over 60 athletes with each team competing in 5 to 7 tournaments.
What it reported doing in 2022
Purpose is designed to fevelop young athletes through youth basketball teams. To build their skills and talents for basketball and leadership through team play at a reduced cost. We developed 6 youth basketball teams, 3 for boys and 3 for girls. Each team played from 5 to 7 tournaments. We served over 60 athletes from grades 6th through 11th.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -35.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.