Irg Action Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873018284
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Delafield, WI, USA
Phone
2625999789
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,204
Expenses
$125,728
Assets
$56,836
Liabilities
$25,931

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CJ SZAFIR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • BILL JOHNSON (CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CJ SZAFIR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • BILL JOHNSON (CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT)
  • KIM BLISS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Developing and advocating for legislation, regulations, and other public policy reforms to make Wisconsin more free and prosperous, engaging with public officials and the general public to promote and stimulate action relating to public policy issues, supporting and educating public officials who share irg's views on public policies, and helping the general public participate in the legislative process.

What it reported doing in 2024

Dedicated to advancing conservative policy solutions.based on the research and ideas for reforms generated by irg and other allied groups and leaders, we take action by advancing legislation in the halls of state government and amplifying community voices in support, and get results by turning policy solutions into law.our roadmap to success includes: developing policy solutions, a "one-stop-shop" of model legislation, talking points and constituent and community support; working with lawmakers in the halls of state government to advance major legislation; mobilizing community leaders from all corners of the state to have their voices heard in the legislative process; educating the public through cutting-edge digital and traditional media on conservative reforms.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.4%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 52.6%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -32.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -61.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.4% of revenue deployed · 52.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $66K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.