Iredell County Rescue Squad and Fire Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 560223180
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Statesville, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7048728192
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,140,790
- Expenses
- $946,603
- Assets
- $789,334
- Liabilities
- $63,140
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- TODD LENDERMAN (CHIEF): $67,500 total reported compensation
- TIMOTHY BARBER (MEMBER AT LA): $34,270 total reported compensation
- GIBBY JENKINS (TREASURER): $33,984 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The objective and mission of iredell county rescue squad & fire, inc. Is to provide a professional level of response by effectively saving lives, through skilled rescue & medical training and rendering assistance in any known circumstance, performing rescues of persons from harm & peril and to provide medical care in a manner that helps achieve a positive outcome for all people for which we respond to.
What it reported doing in 2025
Emergency medical, ambulance, rescue & miscellaneous services (our exempt purposes) were provided to the citizens of iredell county, nc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 96.5%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 43.8%; rating input score 44; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.1% of revenue deployed · 96.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 16 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $913K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.