Iranian Jewish Womens Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953872622
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Beverly Hills, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3108609677
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Academic Exchange
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,117
- Expenses
- $128,434
- Assets
- $60,919
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHAHLA JAVDAN (President)
People named in this filing
- SHIMEN ZAKHOOR GLACSTON (Treasurer)
- NAHID PIRNAZAR OBERMAN (Secretary)
- LOUISE GOLSHAN (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Organization's primary purpose is to promote social and charitable activities designed to promote the welfare of Iranian Jewish Women of Iranian heritage in the Los Angeles, California community. The organization achieves its exempt purpose by offering cultural, religious, educational and community programs as well as providing financial support for other public charities that are exempt from tax pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(1) or (a)(2). The organization has numerous educational events and publishes literature to promote the heritage and culture and provide support to Jewish women of Iranian descent now living in the Los Angeles area to promote related charitable goals.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization published various pieces of literature and conducted educational events and seminars, enhancing the public recognition of the impact of the role of jewish women of iranian descent in society, and protecting the dual identity of the iranian jewish community in los angeles.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.5%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 33
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -68.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -23.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.5% of revenue deployed · 32.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.