Iqra Orphanage Education Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991568813
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Springfield, IL, USA
Phone
6122033293
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Primary, Elementary Schools

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,193
Expenses
$17,474
Assets
$32,536

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HASAN MAHAMOUD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • HASAN MAHAMOUD (PRESIDENT)
  • MASCUD SHARIF BARRE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of iqra orphanage education foundation is to ensure that orphans and underprivileged children from local communities receive quality, free education, with care and attention, to contribute to the development of the surrounding society anditsprogress. At iqra orphanage education foundation, we envision a future where every orphaned child in somalia has the opportunity to receive a nurturing education that empowers them with knowledge, instills compassion, and enables them to build a brighter and self-sufficient future. Our vision is to create a place where each child, regardless of their circumstances, can access quality education, break the cycle of poverty, and contribute positively to society, fostering a community that values learning, empathy, and sustainable progress.

What it reported doing in 2025

Education for orphans and underprivileged children - running school from donations and covering following costs 1.teachers and administrators cost 2. Nutritional and supplies cost 3. R cost such as utilities transportation andmaintenance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.1%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.