Iowa State Usbc Ya Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204386797
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Dewitt, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5636599442
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,586
- Expenses
- $77,604
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALLEN ALSMAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHARON WILLIAMS (DIRECTOR)
- ALLEN ALSMAN (PRESIDENT)
- JOLENE KETELSEN (ASSOCIATION)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote junior bowling in the state of Iowa. The united states bowling congress, as the national governing body, ensures the integrity and protects the future of the sport, provides programs and services and enhances the bowling experience. Purposes include: 1. Providing equal opportunity for all in the sport of bowling without regard to race, religion, age, gender, disability, or national origin. 2. Promoting the game of american tenpins. 3. Conducting and supporting bowling competition. 4. Engaging in any other activities permitted by an organization classified as tax exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.
What it reported doing in 2017
Ensuring the integrity and protecting the future of the sport of bowling by providing programs and services for over 4500 members and enhancing the bowling experience. Promoting the team concept of sports.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 45% for direct work, and 55% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.9%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.9% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 26 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.