Iowa Quilt Museum

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474036015
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Winterset, IA, USA
Phone
5154625988
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Reported finances

Revenue
$161,684
Expenses
$141,827
Assets
$434,997
Liabilities
$81,249

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA SCHUMACHER (Vice President)
  • JANICE MARQUARDT (President)
  • TONY JACOBSON (President)
  • ANNETTE WILDIN (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • MARIANNE FONS (Director)
  • RANDALL PARKIN (Secretary)
  • DIANE MURTHA (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Iowa quilt museum promotes the history of quilting with rotating exhibits of both historic and modern quilts and provides education programs about quilts and quilting.

What it reported doing in 2025

To promote the history of quilting through museum exhibits, educational programs, and presentations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.3%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.07; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.8%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $142K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.