Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421285094
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Clive, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5152448028
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Violence Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,030,249
- Expenses
- $1,719,787
- Assets
- $841,895
- Liabilities
- $144,399
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MARIA CORONA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DR MARIA CORONA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $104,729 total reported compensation
- ADAM STARK (ASSISTANT DIRECTOR): $86,409 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To engage all people in a movement to change the social and political systems that perpetuate violence against women. We do this through education, advocacy and quality services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Victim services support (comprehensive) - funding for this program is provided by the Iowa department of justice, crime victim assistance division (cvad), and includes federal and state funding components. This program supports icadv's training and technical assistance to domestic violence and shelter programs as well as training and technical assistance to other professionals related to interpersonal violence. Among the program's goals are 1.) to identify and/or create culturally specific interventions and prevention strategies that ensure the diverse needs of victims/survivors are met through icadv's culturally specific programs; 2.) to provide support, intensive technical assistance and training to increase access and improve service quality to victims/survivors who receive assistance from domestic violence programs in Iowa; and 3.)to raise public awareness and knowledge concerning the dynamics of domestic violence to enhance service delivery and crisis response to victims/survivors of domestic violence and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 61% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.2%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $81.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.2% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $105K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.