Iowa Arboretum Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 426122889
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Madrid, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5157953216
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Botanical Gardens, Arboreta and Botanical Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,061,103
- Expenses
- $1,072,009
- Assets
- $6,407,181
- Liabilities
- $1,491
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHY LAW (PAST PRESIDENT)
- MIKE BEVINS (Vice President)
- DUANE KENT (President)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK SCHNEIDER (Executive Dir.): $99,913 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To develop and maintain an arboretum and botanical garden in Iowa whose purpose is to be an inspiring educational and recreational resource demonstrating the value and use of trees, shrubs, and other plants in the Iowa landscape.
What it reported doing in 2025
Develop and maintain an arboretum and botanical garden and make them inspiring educational and recreational resources.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.6%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 61%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.98; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.6% of revenue deployed · 61% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $653K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.