Iota Pi Chapter of Theta Chi Fraternity at Lsu
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300870200
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Baton Rouge, LA, USA
- Phone
- 3178481856
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Sororities, Fraternities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $87,166
- Expenses
- $53,332
- Assets
- $57,247
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Raymond Kinzie (President (start Nov 21))
- Caleb Duranceau (President (end Nov 21))
- Carson Kirshbaum (Vice President (start Nov 21))
- Max Welborn (Vice President (end Nov 21))
People named in this filing
- Raymond Kinzie (President (start Nov 21))
- Caleb Duranceau (President (end Nov 21))
- Carson Kirshbaum (Vice President (start Nov 21))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Social Club - Fraternity: 35 Members.
What it reported doing in 2021
Philanthropy and Community Service
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.8%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.