Ionic Ragged Mtn Chapter 20 Order of Eastern Star
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 026004935
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Franklin, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6034553436
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,495
- Expenses
- $18,815
- Assets
- $1,095,902
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH WAKEFIELD (Treasurer): $580 total reported compensation
- CINDY ROGERS (SECTY PRO TEMP): $449 total reported compensation
- CHARLENE SMITH (Secretary): $150 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The order of the eastern star is a fraternal organization devoted to the betterment of humanity through charitable, educational, and fraternal endeavors.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Organization is a fraternal organization devoted to the betterment of humanity through charitable, educational and fraternal endeavors. The organization's charitable and benevolent activities include; 1. Assisting local individuals with housing, utilities, transporation, and medical costs; 2. Providing cards, flowers, and small gifts to local shut-ins; 3. Awarding scholarships; and 4. Making cash contributions to various charitable organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 69.4%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 58.25; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -26.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $580 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.