Inya Burma Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473511367
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- DeKalb, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8157615686
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Graduate, Professional Schools (Separate Entities)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $266,952
- Expenses
- $174,896
- Assets
- $181,873
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CATHERINE RAYMOND (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- FRANCOIS TAINTUR (TREASURER DIRECTOR): $44,740 total reported compensation
- CARMIN BERCHIOLLI (LIASON DIRECTOR): $5,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To establish and operate a research and training institute in burma dedicated to advancing knowledge about burma and its cultural , social and religous diversity. And to promote burma-us acdemic exchanges and fellowship programs
What it reported doing in 2025
Fellowship to us scholars and researchers also training expense
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 61% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Affiliate network. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending through affiliated organizations.
The verdict
MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 53
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.8%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 60.8%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.5%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.8% of revenue deployed · 60.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $45K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.